ORG.Annotate issueshttps://git.metabarcoding.org/org-asm/org-annotate/-/issues2018-08-25T11:39:06Zhttps://git.metabarcoding.org/org-asm/org-annotate/-/issues/13how about adding gawk/awk in Org binaries2018-08-25T11:39:06ZAlain Viarihow about adding gawk/awk in Org binariesI'm considering adding the proper version of gawk/awk (4.0.1) in the ORG.annot binaries
(the distro is already in src/_unix_tools_ but not installed by default)
this will require a bit more time during compilation but this is a breeze
by comparison to exonerate libraries ;-)
what about this ?
I'm considering adding the proper version of gawk/awk (4.0.1) in the ORG.annot binaries
(the distro is already in src/_unix_tools_ but not installed by default)
this will require a bit more time during compilation but this is a breeze
by comparison to exonerate libraries ;-)
what about this ?
Alain ViariAlain Viarihttps://git.metabarcoding.org/org-asm/org-annotate/-/issues/11The problem is : "How do we decide if a chloroplast has inverted repeats ?"2018-08-25T11:39:06ZEric CoissacThe problem is : "How do we decide if a chloroplast has inverted repeats ?"Which rule has to be implemented to decide if a chloroplast genome has got an inverted repeat structure ?
Because for plant without inverted repeat the current algorithm can have some strange behavior.
Moreover it would be nice to not include annotations corresponding to these structures.Which rule has to be implemented to decide if a chloroplast genome has got an inverted repeat structure ?
Because for plant without inverted repeat the current algorithm can have some strange behavior.
Moreover it would be nice to not include annotations corresponding to these structures.